In the last year or so, controversy has been
increasing about the best way to care for the
victim of hypothermia. The use of the warm gas
inhalator has come under scrutiny - does it
really increase the victim's chance of survival?
To clarify this issue, I met with Dr. David Frimm, a
physiologist with the Canadian Armed Forces' Defence
and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine. For
several years, Dr. Frimm and his associates have been
engaged in testing various methods of hypothermia
treatment. His disclosures were startling.
(Addendum: I should mention that Dr. Frimm's team
is responsible for testing the survival gear made
for Canadian sailors and pilots in the North Atlantic
Ocean, one of the coldest bodies of water in the world.)
In tests conducted by the DCIEM, moderate hypothermia
was induced in armed forces volunteers by immersion
in a refrigerated water tank. A warm gas inhalator,
commercially produced in England, was being evaluated.
The experimenters found that wrapping the victim in a
single wool army blanket was just as effective as the
warm gas inhalator for rewarming, and also that the
patient compliance was poor with the warm gas inhalator.
To be effective, the warm air or oxygen must be delivered
with 100% humidification. Many subjects found this very
uncomfortable, and preferred to warm in room air rather
than breathe the warm, moist air. When dry warmed air was
tested, it was found to actually result in a heat loss
from the victim.
What, then, is the best treatment for hypothermia?
First, in mild or moderate hypothermia, the usual external
rewarming methods taught in basic cave rescue courses
will be adequate. These methods are also quite acceptable
for the treatment of acute hypothermia resulting from
relatively brief immersion in cold water. The criteria
here is that the patient's rectal temperature is not
below 91 degrees F.
In chronic or severe hypothermia, the situation is somewhat
different. The patient is in a state of impending metabolic
bakruptcy, and is subject to volume depletion, electrolyte
imbalance, cardiac arrhythmias, and other sequelae.
However, hypothermia in a sense contributes to its own treatment,
since the patient is in a "metabolic icebox". In the absence
of other injuries, the patient will tend to remain stable
(although critical), allowing time to plan and act.
Care, therefore, is directed to advanced monitoring, and
prevention of further heat loss. Active rewarming will
cause the patient to quickly become unstable, and changes
will be fast and furious. If possible, active rewarming
should be delayed until the patient can be taken to an
advanced medical facility; that is, one with a well-equipped
Emergency Department and Intensive care Unit.
(Web Site Administrator's Note - Since this article was written
about ten years ago, thinking has changed. It is now realized
that it is almost impossible in the field to rewarm a patient
enough to reach the unstable state mentioned above. Thus,
active rewarming is now encouraged. See the WEMSI course
notes for further information. -BFR.)
In some cases, it may be possible to bring a medical team and
equipment to the cave entrance or even into the cave, if
circumstances demand. This is a judgment call which will
have to be made by the medical team leader and the surface
coordinator. Remember that helicopter evacuation can greatly
reduce surface travelling times, especially in hilly areas.
General supportive measures, such as intravenous volume
replacement, by cut-down or a CVP line, if necessary, should
be started as early as possible.
The following algorithm will help
in the decisions to be made.
Additional Guidelines for Medical care:


![]() |
Designed by a member of ![]() |
![]() |
| Maintenance Data:
alg.html Date Last Revised: March 10, 1998 |